Quantcast

Peace Garden News

Friday, September 5, 2025

Eighth Circuit backs North Dakota in Missouri River boundary dispute

Webp wg3e6iwn4rktyv9abjlgovpmdlwf

Attorney General Drew H. Wrigley | North Dakota Attorney General's Office

Attorney General Drew H. Wrigley | North Dakota Attorney General's Office

Attorney General Drew Wrigley has announced that the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a victory for the State of North Dakota in a legal dispute concerning the Ordinary High Water Mark for parts of the Missouri River. This case, which began in 2016, centers on mineral royalties from beneath Lake Sakakawea.

The disagreement involves whether state or federal law defines the historic Ordinary High Water Mark, impacting who receives mineral royalties. The State claims ownership of the riverbed channel up to this mark as it existed before Lake Sakakawea's creation in the 1950s, while submerged lands beyond this point are federally owned. North Dakota and federal laws define this boundary differently, affecting royalty payments.

A three-judge panel from the Eighth Circuit largely agreed with North Dakota's position that state law should define this boundary. Attorney General Wrigley commented on the decision: “This case presented some thorny legal questions,” adding that he believes "the Eighth Circuit’s decision properly recognizes the fundamental role that State law traditionally plays in defining property boundaries within our federalist system."

The United States has not yet indicated if they will appeal to the Supreme Court. Wrigley assured that his office is prepared to defend the ruling if necessary.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS